John Chance Lifewave Equine Applications

John Chance demonstrates application techniques and effects of the Lifewave acupuncture patches. I have been amazed at how quick and effective they are on horses as well as people for pain relief. There is no special knowledge or experience needed to use this product. I have had customers purchase to use on their own horses and others have started their own therapy business. I am ready to help you build your equine business. Lifewave Equine

Doctor turns chiropractic care toward animals

Need more Energy!

In search of increased energy and endurance?

I have been wearing one of these wrist bands for two weeks and I cannot believe the improvement in exercise energy and endurance. This could be a great back end product in your practice. Products are available for retail or as an affiliate. Earn 25% on referral sales. www.8ightWave.com Would you like to talk with me about this opportunity?
I think you will enjoy this video demonstration at Florida State University.

Ali Nilforushan, Champion Rider, talks about Magna Wave

Do you use outside therapy services for your horses?

Magna Wave and Gout.

The information below was posted by one of our Magna Wave practitioners. It is always rewarding to hear how our friends and associates are using their machines and the results they receive.

Mary Jo Trotter, Hey Pat! I've used the Magna Wave on my husband the last two times he felt his gout coming on - got to get it early. First time it "steered it off" and he hardly got anything, this last time (we were...vacationing) it helped about 90%. BUT he also continued to have a few brews. 2 days later he was playing tennis! Anyone else using it for this?? If not, should be!!!!! Forgot to add, that was with NO medication.

Magna Wave Human Applications

Create your own video slideshow at animoto.com.

Gary Young talks about Magna Wave

How does Magna Wave do what it does?

Magna Wave Equine Treatment Times

How we were introduced to High Voltage PEMF

Sensitivity to Magna Wave sessions.

Sensitivity to Magna Wave therapy happens in about 1-5% of individuals. This is usually a result of high body toxicity. This sensitivity often decreases as toxicity levels are returned to normal. Because of this potential it is best to start low and with caution and proceed slowly with the amount of time of daily use and use of low field intensities, with only very gradual increases. Client comfort is the key; the therapy is working even if the client cannot feel the Magna Wave pulse.

It’s easier and quicker to move an ion than to rebuild a tissue.

Magna Wave magnetic fields affect charge at the cell membrane and open membrane channels – of all cells. This helps to re balance and restore cell function. Restore enough cells and tissues will function better.

The Effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee and Cervical Spine.

OBJECTIVE. We conducted a randomized, double blind clinical trial to determine the effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee and cervical spine. METHODS. A controlled trial of 18 half-hour active or placebo treatments was conducted in 86 patients with OA of the knee and 81 patients with OA of the cervical spine, in which pain was evaluated using a 10 cm visual analog scale, activities of daily living using a series of questions (answered by the patient as never, sometimes, most of the time, or always), pain on passive motion (recorded as none, slight, moderate, or severe), and joint tenderness (recorded using a modified Ritchie scale). Global evaluations of improvement were made by the patient and examining physician. Evaluations were made at baseline, midway, end of treatment, and one month after completion of treatment. RESULTS. Matched pair t tests showed extremely significant changes from baseline for the treated patients in both knee and cervical spine studies at the end of treatment and the one month follow-up observations, whereas the changes in the placebo patients showed lesser degrees of significance at the end of treatment, and had lost significance for most variables at the one month follow-up. Means of the treated group of patients with OA of the knee showed greater improvement from baseline values than the placebo group by the end of treatment and at the one month follow-up observation. Using the 2-tailed t test, at the end of treatment the differences in the means of the 2 groups reached statistical significance for pain, pain on motion, and both the patient overall assessment and the physician global assessment. The means of the treated patients with OA of the cervical spine showed greater improvement from baseline than the placebo group for most variables at the end of treatment and one month follow-up observations; these differences reached statistical significance at one or more observation points for pain, pain on motion, and tenderness. CONCLUSION. PEMF has therapeutic benefit in painful OA of the knee or cervical spine.

Trock D. et.al. Department of Medicine, Danbury Hospital, CT. J. of Rheumatology